Loading...
Loading...
Compare 895+ AI models, open source rankings, and AI agents — all in one place. Data-driven insights to find the right model for your use case.
Top LLMs for best value, fastest response, and highest capability — based on real benchmark scores.
Ranked by MMLU, coding, math, and reasoning benchmarks. See which AI models lead in overall quality.
| # | Model | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | OpenAI: GPT-5.5 OpenAI | 60.2 |
| 🥈 | GPT-5.5 (high) OpenAI | 58.9 |
| 🥉 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic | 57.3 |
| 4 | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google | 57.2 |
| 5 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 OpenAI | 56.8 |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 (medium) OpenAI | 56.7 |
| 7 | MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 Kimi | 53.9 |
| 8 | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi | 53.8 |
| 9 | OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex OpenAI | 53.6 |
| 10 | xAI: Grok 4.3 xAI | 53.2 |
FindLLM is a free, independent aggregator that compares 895+ large language models by quality, speed, and price. It covers every major model family — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Mistral — plus open-source rankings, agent analytics, task-specific leaderboards, and a cost calculator.
Analysis and guides on LLM performance, pricing trends, and new model releases.
Practical guide to choosing the best LLM for coding workloads in May 2026, comparing GPT-5.5, GPT-5.3-Codex, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and budget options.
Deep DiveOpenAI's GPT-5.4 scores 56.8 quality at $5.63/M tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro nearly matches it for 20% less. A pricing analysis.
Weekly BriefingGoogle's Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview closes to within 0.1 points of Claude Opus 4.7 while costing $4.50 vs $10.00/M tokens. Plus: Grok 4.3 emerges as the speed-value pick.
Weekly LLM analysis delivered to your inbox. No spam.