Loading...
Loading...
Compare 904+ AI models, open source rankings, and AI agents — all in one place. Data-driven insights to find the right model for your use case.
Top LLMs for best value, fastest response, and highest capability — based on real benchmark scores.
Ranked by MMLU, coding, math, and reasoning benchmarks. See which AI models lead in overall quality.
| # | Model | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | OpenAI: GPT-5.5 OpenAI | 60.2 |
| 🥈 | GPT-5.5 (high) OpenAI | 58.9 |
| 🥉 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic | 57.3 |
| 4 | Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google | 57.2 |
| 5 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 OpenAI | 56.8 |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 (medium) OpenAI | 56.7 |
| 7 | Kimi K2.6 Kimi | 53.9 |
| 8 | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi | 53.8 |
| 9 | OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex OpenAI | 53.6 |
| 10 | xAI: Grok 4.3 xAI | 53.2 |
FindLLM is a free, independent aggregator that compares 904+ large language models by quality, speed, and price. It covers every major model family — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Mistral — plus open-source rankings, agent analytics, task-specific leaderboards, and a cost calculator.
Analysis and guides on LLM performance, pricing trends, and new model releases.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview matches Claude Opus 4.7 quality at less than half the price with double the throughput. Here's what that means operationally.
Weekly BriefingGPT-5.5 leads quality at 60.2 but costs 8x more than Kimi K2.6. This week's briefing breaks down who should care.
GuidePractical guide to choosing the best LLM for coding workloads in May 2026, comparing GPT-5.5, GPT-5.3-Codex, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and budget options.
Weekly LLM analysis delivered to your inbox. No spam.